Program 2027-2031

As part of our international cooperation, we are embarking on a new planning cycle for a future joint programme. This work should lead to a new programme for the Belgian international cooperation (DGD) 2027-2031 and will also enable us to gather information for other possible programmes and funding opportunities in the years to come.

In the next DGD Programme, each organisation will have the opportunity to implement its own action plan, and we also wish to place even greater emphasis than before on cooperation between different organisations at the national, continental and international levels. In a rapidly changing world where workers' rights remain a battleground, we believe that cooperation between different social movements is the best way to move forward together and achieve greater impact.

On this page, you will find the information you need to prepare yourself and participate fully in this important planning process. This information will be supplemented and enriched throughout the planning process, including with the results of the steps already completed.

Identifying potential priorities for our cooperation with all the organisations involved will therefore be an essential first step in this process. Therefore, a consultation session will be organised in each country with all the organisations involved, with the support of colleagues from WSM, ACV-CSCi, LCM-ANMC and BIS-MSI. As a group of organisations, brought together around the table, you will be able to identify what you think are the priorities around which we can work together.

During the virtual intercontinental workshop (1-3 July 2025) and the face-to-face continental workshops (in September and October 2025), these proposals will be discussed and weighed up so that the organisations involved can then decide together on common lines of work for the next five years. During the workshops, a global action plan will be drawn up for each of these lines of work.

We’re looking forward to collaborating with you and your networks in order to advance a number of issues that will strengthen workers' rights!

Workers, today and tomorrow – that is, all people whose income depends on work, with a particular focus on those who are excluded, exploited or insecure due to their socio-economic situation, including people working in the informal economy, in precarious jobs and in rural areas. The ILO defines this group of people as “workers”, regardless of whether they are currently engaged in paid work and regardless of the form of contract (or lack thereof) under which they are employed.

THE PROCESS OF THE PLANNING - THE LOGIC
 

Planning and structure of sectors/themes - programme 2027-2031
Virtual intercontinental workshop 1-3 July
Input priorities 2027-2031 ACV-CSCi
Input priorities 2027-2031 Latin America and the Caribbean
Input priorities 2027-2031 Asia
Input priorities 2027-2031 Central Africa
Input priorities 2027-2031 West Africa
Input priorities 2027-2031 BIS-MSI
THE FRAMEWORK FOR OUR COLLABORATION
Our partnerships and the associated programmes are structured according to a specific logic. Below is an overview of the various dynamics that shape our partnerships.
  • Decent work agenda

  • The Coordination Platform for Decent Work and the joint program

The Coordination Platform for Decent Work (CPDW) is a network of nine Belgian civil society organizations active in international cooperation that join forces to promote and implement  the Decent Work agenda worldwide. The CPDW consists of four NGOs (WSM, FOS, Solsoc and Oxfam), two mutual health organisations (ANMC-LCM and Solidaris) and three trade union organizations (ACV-CSC International, BIS-MSI (ACLVB-CGSLB) and IFSI-ISVI (ABVV-FGTB). The platform bases its work on the Joint Strategic Framework (JSF) of Decent Work that brings together 3 (joint) programs in 36 countries spread over Latin-America and the Caribbean, Asia, Africa and Belgium: the program of 1/ WSM, ACV-CSCi, BIS-MSI and ANMC-LCM, 2/ IFSI-ISVI, Solsoc, FOS and Solidaris, and 3/ Oxfam Belgium (decent work program in South-East Asia). The aim of the platform is to promote coordination of strategies between different actors in a country or around a theme, earn from each other in terms of strategies and thematical approaches and to and to jointly engage in policy advocacy in Belgium to put Decent Work higher on the agenda of the Belgian international cooperation. The coordinator of the platform is hired by WSM.

  • Theory of Change

Towards an evidence informed and actor-based theory of change: maximizing interaction effects between the pillars of the decent work agenda to contribute towards resilient societies

  • The importance of networks

Seeking to connect different organisations – whether trade unions, health mutuals, non-governmental organisations, youth, women's and older people's movements, or social and solidarity economy initiatives – in Belgium, Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, with other civil society actors from the local to the intercontinental level, is a strategy: networking.

This work helps build expertise, learn from each other, establish advocacy actions, and more broadly, develop common strategies to ensure respect for decent work and social protection rights at the international, continental and national levels. It also enables us to convey our messages with greater legitimacy and thus reach a wider audience (politicians, civil society, trade unions, academics, etc.).

Protecting the rights of everyone, preventing the negative impact of life’s uncertainties, promoting better living conditions and thus transforming societies, without leaving anyone behind: this is what we do every day through our networking work.

The strength of networking is built on the grassroots experience of its members: this is what gives legitimacy to the actions we take, because we use real-life cases and requests made by communities. The rights-based approach takes precedence. The participation of different stakeholders in the networks helps to anchor social movements as a pillar of democratic governance and the implementation of the Decent Work Agenda.

The challenge of networking is to broaden its sphere of influence: we therefore intend to continue investing resources and working time in order to build robust national, continental and international networks capable of carrying out joint actions.

Networking is achieved through the facilitation of the INSP!R network, which promotes social protection rights, and active participation in other networks such as the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) and its regional branches (Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean), as well as in social and solidarity economy networks such as RIPESS. Collaboration is also taking shape with the AIM, an international mutualist network, through its link with the Mutualité Chrétienne de Belgique. Networking also takes place within this country to raise awareness of the struggles for international solidarity within the institutions CNCD-11.11.11 and 11.11.11, as well as within the Labour Christian movement, with MOC et Beweging.net.

 
  • The tripolar model for sustainable development governance

THE PLANNING CONTEXT AND THE NEW PROGRAM

ITUC priorities and themes
Themes and regional priorities of the ITUC

Decent work and job creation

All over the world, the social and solidarity economy creates jobs for millions of vulnerable workers who find it difficult to find opportunities or make a decent living from their work in the current economic system. The current economic system favours economic activities within globalised value chains that do not contribute to decent work and lead to massive violations of human and environmental rights. The social and solidarity economy is therefore an alternative that connects people through links of solidarity. It redistributes profits fairly and transparently, and ensures democratic decision-making that includes women and young people in particular. It also encourages workers to form trade unions. The social and solidarity economy also takes care of the environment. Human development is at the heart of the concerns of these initiatives, placing social justice and the inclusive integration of vulnerable people into society at the centre. 

Support for social economy cooperatives is therefore a priority when we talk about job creation. It is an ideal instrument for giving people access to decent work and, at the same time, protecting them from the risks they encounter throughout their lives. In fact, the social and solidarity economy is a lever that enables workers to access universal social protection, through a variety of different mechanisms (increased income enabling enrolment in pre-existing social security schemes, collective registration of cooperators, collaboration between community health mutuals and cooperatives, etc.). 

For millions of informal workers, the social and solidarity economy is a valuable tool for making the transition to the formal economy, as mentioned in Recommendation 204 adopted by the International Labour Organisation in 2015.  

Recently, the International Labour Organisation (2022) and the United Nations (2023) adopted resolutions recognising the key role of the social and solidarity economy in human development. These resolutions aim to promote this economy and accelerate its recognition by governments, economic players, social movements and trade unions. 

References and tools: 

Social Dialogue

A recent study conducted in 2025 by WSM, ACV-CSC and BIS-MSI (the international solidarity organisation of the Belgian liberal trade union) on the shrinking of civic space concludes that the influence of civil society organisations, including trade unions, in shaping public policy is diminishing worldwide. Many organisations struggle to engage with state authorities, but encounter bureaucratic obstacles, funding limitations, and even repression and violence. In several countries, governments sometimes justify these restrictions on security grounds, thereby weakening social dialogue and the commitment to other forms of institutionalised dialogue with non-union organisations representing informal workers.  

In many countries, trade unions say they face systemic anti-union policies and legal obstacles that prevent them from mobilising and organising workers effectively. Employer reprisals, legal harassment and even physical threats against trade union leaders and activists are increasingly common. In some countries, government-controlled institutions even undermine trade union activities by creating fake rival unions aligned with state interests. 

Civil society organisations also face a wide range of constraints, including exclusion from consultation processes and institutionalised dialogue with state authorities, restrictions on foreign funding and administrative barriers that prevent them from operating freely. In many cases, repression goes beyond legal mechanisms and includes public stigmatisation, surveillance and police intimidation, particularly in regimes with authoritarian tendencies. 

The shrinking civic space in some cases leads to self-censorship, as organisations fear reprisals from the government. Many social movements, including trade unions, say they are reluctant to speak out against government policies because of threats of deregistration by the authorities and the risk of harassment and violence. 

Social organisations, including trade unions, nevertheless respond to the shrinking civic space with a mixture of defensive and adaptive strategies. They never give up and they know they have to survive in this context. One of the main approaches is to strengthen internal governance and capacity development efforts. This includes training union leaders and activists in negotiation, advocacy and legal knowledge to navigate increasingly complex regulatory environments. 

Building alliances at national and international level is another essential response. By drawing on international labour and human rights frameworks, these organisations can challenge repressive policies and build global solidarity. 

Digital advocacy and alternative media channels have emerged as essential tools in the face of shrinking civic space. Many organisations have moved their advocacy efforts online, using social media, encrypted communication platforms and independent digital news outlets to bypass state-controlled narratives.  

Legal advocacy based on the regulations of international institutions such as the ILO is a key strategy for some trade unions and social movements. This legal approach is proving effective in maintaining pressure on governments to meet their commitments on labour standards and human rights. 

References and tools: 

Health and Universal Social Protection

Social protection is a human right. And yet, in 2024, almost half of the global population (47,4%) had no coverage at all. This is down from 57,2% in 2015. However, at the current pace it will take until at least 2075 to achieve Universal Social Protection. Moreover, Universal social protection means not only ‘some social protection for everybody’. It means adequate social protection, throughout the life cycle for everyone.  

Therefore, multiple sources of financing are needed. A smart combination of solidarity based social contributions and fair, progressive tax revenue is the best guarantee for sustainable and broadly supported social protection systems.  

Even if governments bare the primary responsibility to guarantee the right to social protection for all their citizens, civil society and trade unions play key roles in addressing governance and coverage gaps in social protection. They also contribute to inclusive, effective, and sustainable social protection governance in all stages of the policy cycle.  

Social protection helps people adapt to and cope with climate-related shocks by providing income security and access to healthcare.  

It is therefore paramount to continue our action to strengthen and extend social protection coverage to excluded groups. We must stimulate the transition from the informal to the formal economy, push for the inclusion of a genuine gender perspective in social protection and take into consideration demographic changes and the climate crisis, which aggravates health risks and the risk of income loss. 

References and tools :

 

Evolutions in population

-

Labour rights: Just transition and Human Rights Due Diligence

Labour laws are a set of standards and regulations which govern the relationship between an employer and the workers to ensure better work, safety and health at the workplace, freedom of association, right to collective bargaining, contract regulation, rules regarding working hours, protection of the salary, maternity protection, life-long learning,...  Labour rights are demands which workers can enforce with their employer and which the latter must respect. As a result, labour rights constitute the game rules which are needed to allow workers to work in dignity and be completely fulfilled. The effective enjoyment of these rights prevents workers fro being treated like tools and their labour as a commodity.    

Labour rights need to be respected, promoted and enforced in a more and more complex international labour context. We need to ensure that all workers and their environment are protected wherever the companies are located. The state bears the duty to protect human rights, the corporate the responsibility to respect human rights and access to remedy for victims of business-related abuses. Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) is a central concept and captures the process to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how it addresses the impacts on human rights. 

In a context where climate change disproportionately affects the most marginalized, threatening poverty reduction, with a high risk for women who are extra vulnerable for climate change, a just transition needs to be engaged. A just transition is a transition towards a future which ensures climate action, sustainable development and decent work for all in its process as well as its outcome. To be sustainable and democratically implemented, the transition must not only be green but also socially just.  

References and tools :

 

CAPITALISATION
 
In the current programme, we learned plenty. Both through studies, and through the activities and collaborations themselves. These insights form an important basis for shaping future work.
The mid-term evaluation of the joint programme 2022-2026 on Resilience of CSOs including trade unions within a context of shrinking civic space
 
In 2024, we conducted a study on the impact of shrinking civil space on the realisation of decent work and the right to social protection within our collaborations and the resilience of civil society organisations to deal with it. The research took place in 11 countries: Belgium, Peru, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia, Benin, Brazil, the Philippines, Niger, Burkina Faso, Burundi and Haiti. This executive summary describes the key elements of the study: the insights on the impact of shrinking civil space on the work of organisations, the strategies used by organisations to deal with it and a series of recommendations to strengthen future work and collaborations to cope with this shrinking civil space.
Decent work, the right to social protection, the social and solidarity economy
  • The right to social protection
    • A vision and strategy paper of INSP!R on the right to social protection
    • Social protection - video: we work together to extend social protection to everyone in the world. It is a powerful tool to help excluded groups, especially people in the informal economy and in precarious jobs, and to reduce inequality. To achieve this expansion effectively, our partners offer specific services such as health insurance in solidarity, access to microcredit or training on safety and health at work. Koen Detavernier (advocacy officer social protection, WSM) explains.
    • Civil society's role in the governance of effective, inclusive, and sustainable social protection systems: this policy brief and video present key insights on strengthening social protection governance through civil societyi participation. It summarizes a larger study on the role of civil society in social protection governance1 to inform policy makers, civil society actors, and other actors of Belgium’s international cooperation working on social protection. The brief first discusses how civil society participation can strengthen different dimensions of social protection governance, in different stages of the policy cycle. It then turns to key strategies, opportunities, and challenges for enabling and promoting the contributory roles of civil society towards stronger social protection governance. Both this brief and the larger study depart from the premise that the structural and meaningful participation of civil society in a so-called tripolar governance model can contribute to inclusive, democratic, and effective governance for sustainable development; social protection is a key aspect of sustainable development and therefore a key policy area for exploring the potential value of a tripolar governance model.
  • Social and solidarity economy
    • Video | Social economy provides for the employment of vulnerable groups who find it difficult or impossible to find work in the regular economic system. Solidarity economy connects people, shares responsibility and strengthens mutual solidarity. Santiago Fisscher, department chief advocacy WSM, explains in this video
    • Future opportunities and challenges for the Social and Solidarity Economy. Webinar summary | The representatives of several organizations and international institutions met in a webinar  to share goals and with the objective of chieving global social justice for all citizens of the world. Indeed, WSM, INSP!R, WIEGO, RIPESS Intercontinental and IYCW, together with the ILO, members of Civil Society organizations and more than 150 participants from all over the world discussed the ins and outs of the Social and Solidarity Economy — SSE —, which was the subject of a Resolution adopted at the 110th International Labor Conference — ILC — on Decent Work and the Social and Solidarity Economy.
    • How the social and solidarity economy can promote (the right to) social protection. Publication from HIVA | This report provides an overview of the various roles the SSE can play in promoting social protection, while also highlighting its strengths and challenges. The findings show that the SSE can contribute to different aspects of social protection through diverse mechanisms and over different time horizons. In the short term, the SSE can address gaps in formal systems as a service provider and by facilitating access to existing systems, particularly benefiting informal economy workers. Over the medium term, the SSE can strengthen people’s capacities for participation in (formal) contributory social protection schemes by promoting secure livelihoods, resilience, and mutual support within communities. In the long run, the SSE can promote worker organization, innovation and collective action and as such contribute towards the transformation of social and economic systems. The report underscores the importance of public policies, partnerships, and alliances - particularly with trade unions and (local) governments—for scaling the SSE’s contributions while maintaining its values. However, challenges such as resource constraints, tensions between stakeholders, and risks to SSE autonomy require careful navigation.
Specific themes
  • Human rights due diligence
    • Workers in international value chains are interconnected whether they work in Belgium or in a manufacturing country. The problems they experience are of a different scale but they are symptoms of the same model that shifts the consequences of human rights violations and environmental degradation onto society. Companies have a responsibility to respect human rights and the environment in their value chains, but ongoing violations show that voluntary initiatives do not work. Structural change will only come when companies are required to assume this responsibility. In April 2023, the EU parliament passed legislation around mandatory duty of care. Unfortunately, today the EU already wants to turn back the clock, eroding several regulatory initiatives.
    • Explanation by Géraldine Dezé, former advocacy worker HRDD at WSM, in this video
  • Health in all policies
    • Health mutuals' identity card: The ‘Mutualité chrétienne’ (1) is involved in many international cooperations (2). This also requires the organisation to describe its specific nature as a ‘health mutuals” within the framework of an ‘Identity card’ which can apply both to MCs themselves and to many other organisations worldwide. The purpose of this ‘identity card’ is to clarify the basic principles and values of ‘health mutuals’ as well as the different types of service, funding and structure. This ‘Identity card’ also allows us to identify potential international partners when the context and terminology are different to what we know in Belgium (3) and to involve these ‘health mutuals’ partners in shared international cooperation (regional, continental and global) to develop and strengthen access to health through high-quality health services, universal health coverage, health promotion, prevention and education services. This cooperation aims to defend together the right to health taking into account all its determinants. This should strengthen the ‘health mutuals model’ in Belgium, Europe and worldwide.
    • Universal Health Coverage (UHC) for all by 2030 to strengthen climate resilience health systems: Climate change directly and indirectly affects people’s health. The greatest impact tends to be felt by the most vulnerable, such as the poor, women, children, elderly, people with pre-existing health concerns, co-morbidities, indigenous peoples and minorities. Climate disaster can make health systems collapse as seen during the Covid-19 pandemic. Climate change will also be affecting people’s ability to work and generate income.
  • Just transition
    • Asia Workshop on Climate Justice and Adaptive Social Protection | Climate change will affect all countries, but people in the poorest countries and poor people in richer countries are more likely to suffer the most. They are living in high-risk areas such as on the rivers bank and often can’t afford safely built houses. Many of them depend on their incomes from climate-sensitive sectors, such as agriculture or fisheries and have no means to cope with climate change, no savings, no social protection, or poor access to public services. Africa, Small Island countries and Asia are likely to be particularly affected by climate change.
  • The financing of social protection
    • Bridging the divides. Strengthening civil society advocacy networks for universal social protection: experiences from Cambodia, Nepal, Senegal, and Uganda | The urgent need for appropriate, adequate and sustainable financing of social protection programmes and systems gained importance in the face of multiple crises. Investment in robust social protection systems to progress towards universal coverage, is recognised as an important instrument to build prosperous and inclusive societies and enhance resilience in the face of adversity. While there are many ways to do so, governments are often not well equipped to identify and design the most effective financing strategies tailored to their unique contexts. To overcome these hurdles, it is crucial to foster consensus building processes on ways forward to support low and middle income countries willing to invest in social protection in an efficient and effective manner. Collaboration between development actors is an important next step to forge a path forward that ensures universal social protection leaving no one behind. This report highlights the valuable lessons and insights garnered with regards to the network building strategies used by the GCSPF to effectively influence decision makers.
EN ES FR NL
About us Get informed Our network Donate now

News Contact